Question: Elvis Presley What Is The Difference?

( Back )

Answer #1:

There was no suspicion of foul play in Elvis's death.
It's nothing to do with the amount of fame they both had, its just 2 different situations.

The police suspected that there was foul play in Michaels death because there was lots of evidence to suggest this, however Elvis did through his own addiction and there was no evidence to support foul play in his case.

Answer #2:

Elvis' doctor was investigated.
No he didn't have greater fame than Michael Jackson.

Answer #3:

Elvis was addicted to drugs and Michael was addicted to pain killers (caused by the accident in which his head was burnt)
Elvis was used to drinking, smoking, doing drugs because of his addictions and over time he'd gone depressed due to usage of drugs. Michael never smoked, never used drugs and did not like drinking. He wasn't depressed, but if some believe he was, it's due to all the rumors about him and all that Martin Bashir did to him.
Elvis died in his flat, completely gone mad, Michael died because his doctor gave him an over dose of propofol, a medicine that's supposed to be given by specialists. So....
I hope I answered your question.

BTW. Michal's fame was WORLD WIDE, people from Afghanestan knew him and loved him (I know sme people). Elvis may have been called the KING, but his fame didn't touch many people.

Answer #4:

The main doctor involved in prescribing medicine to Elvis was initially deemed not to be liable for his death. But as more evidence came to light, the doctor was suspended and had his license revoked around 15years later after more evidence came to light as to how the doctor over-prescribed.

However, the difference is that the death of Elvis was not deemed to be a homicide.





** Powered by Yahoo Answers